Performance and Employers’ Feedback of the Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Management Graduates
Laylyn Z. Espedilla¹, Genebelle E. Oniego²
¹,² State University of Northern Negros, Philippines
Abstract

This study assessed the professional performance of PhD in Educational Management (PhDEM) graduates from Southern University of Northern Negros (SUNN), specifically Batch 2021–2023. It examined the extent to which program outcomes align with workplace expectations and organizational goals through a concurrent mixed-method design. Quantitative data were gathered using competency assessment ratings from graduates, employers, and peers. At the same time, qualitative insights were collected through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with five (5) PhDEM graduates, five (5) immediate supervisors, and five (5) colleagues. Findings revealed that graduates demonstrated strong performance in leadership, research, and innovation, with consistently high ratings in effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, quality of outputs, and contributions to organizational outcomes. Thematic analysis confirmed that competencies in content knowledge, research, leadership, and communication significantly contributed to institutional development. However, stakeholders also suggested enhancing practical management training and policy development within the program. Overall, the study affirms the relevance of the PhDEM program in preparing graduates for complex leadership roles in education. Recommendations were formulated to strengthen the curriculum and support mechanisms based on both quantitative performance indicators and qualitative stakeholder feedback.

Keywords: Educational Leadership, Employer Feedback, PhDEM Graduates, Professional Performance, Program Outcomes
Suggested Citation (APA Style 7th Edition):
Espedilla, Laylyn Z., & Oniego, Genebelle E., (2026). Performance and Employers’ Feedback of the Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Management Graduates. Global Journal of STEM Education & Management Research, 2(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18667806
Full Article